e-Factura validator

All error codes › BR-AE-04

BR-AE-04 – Reverse charge: seller VAT identifier missing (charge)

Erroren16931applies to Romanian e-Factura

What the rule says

An Invoice that contains a Document level charge (BG-21) where the Document level charge VAT category code (BT-102) is "Reverse charge" shall contain the Seller VAT Identifier (BT-31), the Seller tax registration identifier (BT-32) and/or the Seller tax representative VAT identifier (BT-63) and the Buyer VAT identifier (BT-48) and/or the Buyer legal registration identifier (BT-47).

How to fix it

Fill in or correct the fields named in the rule (the BT/BG codes tell you which). The test below shows exactly what is checked in the XML. Quickest: validate the invoice to get the exact location and, for amounts, the correct value.

Check your invoice for free

Paste the XML and see every error with the exact fix and the correct amounts.

Where it is checked in the XML

Context: /ubl:Invoice | /cn:CreditNote

Test (XPath):

(exists(//cac:AllowanceCharge[cbc:ChargeIndicator=true()]/cac:TaxCategory[normalize-space(cbc:ID) = 'AE'][cac:TaxScheme/normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID))='VAT']) and (exists(//cac:AccountingSupplierParty/cac:Party/cac:PartyTaxScheme/cbc:CompanyID) or exists(//cac:TaxRepresentativeParty/cac:PartyTaxScheme[cac:TaxScheme/(normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID)) = 'VAT')]/cbc:CompanyID)) and (exists(//cac:AccountingCustomerParty/cac:Party/cac:PartyTaxScheme[cac:TaxScheme/(normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID)) = 'VAT')]/cbc:CompanyID) or exists(//cac:AccountingCustomerParty/cac:Party/cac:PartyLegalEntity/cbc:CompanyID))) or not(exists(//cac:AllowanceCharge[cbc:ChargeIndicator=true()]/cac:TaxCategory[normalize-space(cbc:ID) = 'AE'][cac:TaxScheme/normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID))='VAT']))

Related rules